A Detailed Look at a Copied Document ,
Jane Lead's "Heavenly Cloud".

 


Note:
Abbreviations used on this page are as follows ...

  • PasstheWORD is abbreviated as PTW;

  • Jane Lead is abbreviated as JL;

  • The Editor at janelead.org, Diane Guerrero, is abbreviated as DG.

 

First: A Detailed Comparison between PTW's copyrighted, electronic, source files for JL's The Heavenly Cloud Now Breaking   and DG's derivative work, the SDV edition of the same...

As you review the Document Sample-Comparisons below notice that ...

PasstheWORD's Copyrighted Source E-Files of the Authentic JL Documents are shown on the LEFT. 

DG's Early Versions of Modified Documents at janelead.org are shown on the RIGHT.

DGsHeavCldTitlePageCompared to PTWs
The Title Pages again compared:  DG has copied the PTW original, changed the spelling of just one word from PTW's online version of the authentic original, which PTW had rendered to look as close  as possible to the title page of JL's printed 17th century edition.

 

Now, let's examine the typical manipulations done by DG to PTW's original source document.

1stHeavCld Content Comparison
Comparison #1:  DG takes the PTW original, breaks it apart, adds her own new paragraph definitions and numbers (thus interrupting the flow of the message), adds a numbered list, and applies her choice of changes to the content of the text.

 

 

2ndHeavCld Content Comparison
Comparison #2:  DG continues breaking apart the original content into new paragraphs, and applies her changes.

 

 

     3rdHeavCld Content Comparison
Comparison #3: This set of verses has been copied exactly into DG's derivative version.

 

 

     4thHeavCld Content Comparison
Comparison #4:  In this example, DG is still arbitrarily breaking text into new paragraphs
and she is beginning to add her new section titles where they did not appear in the original.

 

 

5thHeavCld Content Comparison
Comparison #5:  Another section of verse is copied by DG from PTW
with only slight changes for her SDV edition.

 

 

6thHeavCld Content Comparison
Comparison #6:  And so it goes; DG is copying the original, adding new paragraph numbering,
adding section marks, adding her own section titles, etc.

 

 

Second:   Now, let's see why DG's document
looks SO MUCH like PTW's original source document...

Take a look at the underlying HTML3 code on the left which was generated over 10 years ago when the manuscript text was first transcribed by PTW.   Now look at the underlying HTML code from DG's Derivative edition on the right...it's the SAME code.

1stHeavenly Cloud HTML Code Comparison
Whenever DG opened one of PTW's documents in her more modern software, OR whenever she copied and pasted from the PTW originals into her e-files, she got the underlying old code from PTW as well. 


Notice that when she leaves the text intact after she pastes it, the old code still is retained which fact showed clearly upon examination to anyone who knew how to "view the source code" from their browser. 
2ndHeavenly Cloud HTML Code Comparison
But when DG started changing the spacing and reformatting, her more modern HTML software produced pieces of modern code that look a lot different from the old code as seen farther down on the right in this example.

The presence of the old code in DG's derivative works was proof positive that she had been copying directly from the PTW copyrighted e-files. 

 

This screen-capture showing examples of some HTML 3 syntax on the left versus DG's more modern HTML code on the right, should be informative to those with eyes to see.

3rdHeavenly Cloud HTML Code Comparison

When DG composed something of her own in her more modern software, as seen on the right in the sample above, she generated HTML source code altogether different from the old HTML3 code shown on the left from a PTW sample. Compare the old code syntax vs. the more modern, for these 2 samples. 


SUMMARY OF THIS DETAILED LOOK

If Diane Guerrero had done all her own work, ALL of the HTML code for every single part of every derivative SDV document should be in her more modern HTML code, which it obviously is not.  The presence of HTML3 code within DG's e-files proved to those at PTW that DG had helped herself to the foundation code from PTW's manually transcribed e-files...and now you know it too.   She violated the copyright laws of the United States and attempted to cover up her guilt.

As soon as DG became aware (in June of 2009) that her HTML code was being examined, thus disclosing her illegal activities, she quickly began converting all of her SDV editions into PDF files as a method of "covering her tracks" so that in the future, no one would be able to examine them as we had done, and no one would ever know what she had done. 

As of 2012, ALL of her SDV documents offered at janelead.org have been converted to PDF files which she has branded with her own name. 

Her cover-up is complete; or is it?  What does your heart tell you?

Back to:  The Fair Warning Reports Page

Back to: Index of Jane Lead Manuscripts